10. Discussion agent with tools (Two Agent Debates with Tools)
Discussion agents using tools (Agent Debates with Tools)
This example shows how to simulate a multi-agent conversation that allows agents to access the tool.
Initialize for LangSmith tracking.
import os# Enter the project name for debugging.os.environ["LANGCHAIN_PROJECT"]="DEBATE AGENT"
DialogueAgent and DialogueSimulator
In this laptop, we will show you how to implement multi-agent simulations where authorized agents determine who to speak to. This follows the opposite selection method of multi-agent decentralized speaker selection.
send The method uses the conversation history to date and the agent's prefix to deliver a message to the chat model and return a response.
receive The method adds messages from other agents to the conversation record.
from typing import Callable, Listfrom langchain.schema import ( AIMessage, HumanMessage, SystemMessage,)from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAIclassDialogueAgent:def__init__(self,name:str,system_message: SystemMessage,model: ChatOpenAI, ) ->None:# Sets the name of the agent. self.name = name# Sets the system message. self.system_message = system_message# Set up the LLM model. self.model = model# Specify the agent name. self.prefix =f"{self.name}: "# Initializes the agent. self.reset()defreset(self):""" Resets the conversation history. """ self.message_history = ["Here is the conversation so far."]defsend(self) ->str:""" Add a system message + conversation content and finally the agent's name to the message. """ message = self.model( [ self.system_message,HumanMessage(content="\n".join( [self.prefix] + self.message_history)), ] )return message.contentdefreceive(self,name:str,message:str) ->None:""" name 이 말한 message 를 메시지 내역에 추가합니다. """ self.message_history.append(f"{name}: {message}")
DialogueSimulator
inject The method is given name ( name ) And message ( message Start a conversation with ), and have all agents receive that message.
step The method selects the next speaker, and when that speaker sends a message, all agents receive the message. And it increases the current stage.
Provides the ability to simulate conversations between multiple agents.
DialogueAgent Represents individual agents, DialogueSimulator Coordinates and manages conversations between agents.
DialogueAgentWithTools
DialogueAgent Expand to make the tool available DialogueAgentWithTools Define the class.
DialogueAgentWithTools Class DialogueAgent Classes were inherited.
send The method serves to create and return messages by the agent.
create_openai_tools_agent Initialize the agent chain using functions.
Defines the tools (tools) that the agent will use when initializing.
Tool settings
Defines a document search tool (Retrieval Tool).
Internet search tools
Generate tools that can be searched on the Internet.
Set up the tools each agent can utilize.
names The dictionary defines the name of the debater (prefix name) and the tools that each discussion agent can utilize.
topic Select the subject of the discussion.
① Document-based tools
② Search based tools
LLM to add details to topic description
You can use the Large Language Model (LLM) to make the description of a given topic more detailed.
To do this, first provide a brief description or overview of the subject as input to the LLM. Then I ask LLM to elaborate on the subject.
Since LLM has learned a huge amount of text data, it can generate additional information and details related to a given topic. This allows you to extend the initial brief description to richer and more detailed content.
Description of the conversation based on the given conversation topic (topic) and participants (names) conversation_description ) To generate.
agent_descriptor_system_message Is a SystemMessage that states that you can add a description of the participants in the conversation.
generate_agent_description The function generates a description generated by LLM for each participant (name).
agent_specifier_prompt Conversation description and participant name, word restrictions ( word_limit ) Is composed of HumanMessage.
Using the ChatOpenAI model agent_specifier_prompt Generate a description of the participant (agent_description) based on.
You can write phrases that describe each panelist's brief position.
class DialogueSimulator:
def __init__(
self,
agents: List[DialogueAgent],
selection_function: Callable[[int, List[DialogueAgent]], int],
) -> None:
# Set the list of agents.
self.agents = agents
# Initialize the simulation step.
self._step = 0
# Sets a function to select the next speaker.
self.select_next_speaker = selection_function
def reset(self):
# Initialize all agents.
for agent in self.agents:
agent.reset()
def inject(self, name: str, message: str):
"""
Start a conversation with the message of name.
"""
# All agents receive the message.
for agent in self.agents:
agent.receive(name, message)
# Increase the simulation step.
self._step += 1
def step(self) -> tuple[str, str]:
# 1. Select the next speaker.
speaker_idx = self.select_next_speaker(self._step, self.agents)
speaker = self.agents[speaker_idx]
# 2. Sends a message to the next speaker.
message = speaker.send()
# 3. All agents receive the message.
for receiver in self.agents:
receiver.receive(speaker.name, message)
# 4. Increase the simulation step.
self._step += 1
# Returns the speaker's name and message.
return speaker.name, message
from langchain.agents import AgentExecutor, create_openai_tools_agent
from langchain import hub
class DialogueAgentWithTools(DialogueAgent):
def __init__(
self,
name: str,
system_message: SystemMessage,
model: ChatOpenAI,
tools,
) -> None:
# Calls the constructor of the parent class.
super().__init__(name, system_message, model)
# Loads a tool using the given tool name and arguments.
self.tools = tools
def send(self) -> str:
"""
Applies the chat model to the message history and returns the message string.
"""
prompt = hub.pull("hwchase17/openai-functions-agent")
agent = create_openai_tools_agent(self.model, self.tools, prompt)
agent_executor = AgentExecutor(agent=agent, tools=self.tools, verbose=True)
# Generate AI messages.
message = AIMessage(
content=agent_executor.invoke(
{
"input": "\n".join(
[self.system_message.content]
+ [self.prefix]
+ self.message_history
)
}
)["output"]
)
# Returns the contents of the generated message.
return message.content
from langchain.text_splitter import RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter
from langchain_community.vectorstores import FAISS
from langchain_openai import OpenAIEmbeddings
from langchain.document_loaders import TextLoader
# Load PDF file. Enter path to file.
loader1 = TextLoader("data/Opposition to medical school expansion.txt")
loader2 = TextLoader("data/Opposition to medical school expansion.txt")
# Split your document using the text splitter.
text_splitter = RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter(chunk_size=500, chunk_overlap=50)
# Load and split the document.
docs1 = loader1.load_and_split(text_splitter)
docs2 = loader2.load_and_split(text_splitter)
# Create a VectorStore.
vector1 = FAISS.from_documents(docs1, OpenAIEmbeddings())
vector2 = FAISS.from_documents(docs2, OpenAIEmbeddings())
# Create a Retriever.
doctor_retriever = vector1.as_retriever(search_kwargs={"k": 3})
gov_retriever = vector2.as_retriever(search_kwargs={"k": 3})
# Import the function that creates the retriever tool from the tools module in the langchain package.
from langchain.tools.retriever import create_retriever_tool
doctor_retriever_tool = create_retriever_tool(
doctor_retriever,
name="document_search",
description="This is a document about the Korean Medical Association's opposition to the expansion of university medical schools. "
"Refer to this document when you want to present a rebuttal to the proponents of medical school expansion.",
)
gov_retriever_tool = create_retriever_tool(
gov_retriever,
name="document_search",
description="This is a document about the Korean government's support for the expansion of university medical schools. "
"Refer to this document when you want to provide a rebuttal to the opposition to medical school expansion.",
)
# TavilySearchResults 클래스를 langchain_community.tools.tavily_search 모듈에서 가져옵니다.
from langchain_community.tools.tavily_search import TavilySearchResults
# Create an instance of the TavilySearchResults class.
# k=3 means that we will retrieve up to 3 search results.
search = TavilySearchResults(k=3)
names = {
"Doctor Union(Medical Association)": [doctor_retriever_tool], # w의사협회 에이전트 도구 목록
"Government(Government of the Republic of Korea)": [gov_retriever_tool], # 정부 에이전트 도구 목록
}
# Selecting a topic for discussion
topic = "As of 2024, is it necessary to expand the number of medical school seats in South Korea?"
# Word limits for phrases describing debaters
word_limit = 50
names = {
"Doctor Union(Medical Association)": [search], # 의사협회 에이전트 도구 목록
"Government(Government of the Republic of Korea)": [search], # 정부 에이전트 도구 목록
}
# Selecting a topic for discussion
topic = "As of 2024, is it necessary to expand the number of medical school seats in South Korea?"
word_limit = 50 # Word limit for task brainstorming
conversation_description = f"""Here is the topic of conversation: {topic}
The participants are: {', '.join(names.keys())}"""
agent_descriptor_system_message = SystemMessage(
content="You can add detail to the description of the conversation participant."
)
def generate_agent_description(name):
agent_specifier_prompt = [
agent_descriptor_system_message,
HumanMessage(
content=f"""{conversation_description}
Please reply with a description of {name}, in {word_limit} words or less in expert tone.
Speak directly to {name}.
Give them a point of view.
Do not add anything else. Answer in KOREAN."""
),
]
# Generate agent descriptions using ChatOpenAI.
agent_description = ChatOpenAI(temperature=0)(
agent_specifier_prompt).content
return agent_description
# Generate agent descriptions for each participant's name.
agent_descriptions = {name: generate_agent_description(name) for name in names}
# Prints the generated agent description.
agent_descriptions
{'Doctor Union':'The Council of Doctors protects the interests of the medical community and represents the interests of doctors, providing professional opinions on medical policy. It is expected that the Council of Doctors should take a position to balance the quality of health care and the positivity of doctors against the expansion of medical gardens.','Government (Government of the Republic of Korea)':'The Government of the Republic of Korea is the state's executive body, It is the subject responsible for the formulation and implementation of policies. The government must promote and implement policies in various fields for the well-being and development of the people. Appropriate measures are needed for the problem of expanding the university's medical school.'}
agent_descriptions = {
"Doctor Union(의사협회)": "The Medical Association is an organization that protects the rights and interests of the medical community and represents the interests of doctors. We value the working environment and safety of doctors and strive to provide patient safety and high-quality medical services. "
"The current position is that there is a sufficient number of doctors, and increasing the number of medical schools has little effect on vitalizing essential medical care or local medical care. ww.",
"Government(대한민국 정부)": "대한민국 정부는 국가의 행정을 책임지는 주체로서, 국민의 복지와 발전을 책임져야 합니다. "
"우리나라는 의사수가 절대 부족한 상황이며, 노인인구가 늘어나면서 의료 수요가wwwww 급증하고 있습니다. OECD 국가들도 최근 의사수를 늘렸습니다. 또한, 증원된 의사 인력이 필수의료와 지역 의료로 갈 수있도록 튼튼한 의료사고 안정망 구축 및 보상 체계의 공정성을 높이고자 합니다.",
}
Global System Message Settings
System message is a message generated by the system prior to user input in an interactive AI system.
These messages establish the context of the conversation, and each agent to the user Position and purpose It serves to inform.
Creating an effective system message can facilitate interaction with users and improve the quality of conversation.
Prompt description
Notify the agent's name and description.
Agents need to use tools to find information and refute the conversation's claims.
Agents should cite sources, not fake citations or sources not found.
Agents should stop talking as soon as they finish speaking from their point of view.
def generate_system_message(name, description, tools):
return f"""{conversation_description}
Your name is {name}.
Your description is as follows: {description}
Your goal is to persuade your conversation partner of your point of view.
DO look up information with your tool to refute your partner's claims.
DO cite your sources.
DO NOT fabricate fake citations.
DO NOT cite any source that you did not look up.
Do not add anything else.
Stop speaking the moment you finish speaking from your perspective.
Answer in KOREAN.
"""
agent_system_messages = {
name: generate_system_message(name, description, tools)
for (name, tools), description in zip(names.items(), agent_descriptions.values())
}
# 에이전트 시스템 메시지를 순회합니다.
for name, system_message in agent_system_messages.items():
# 에이전트의 이름을 출력합니다.
print(name)
# 에이전트의 시스템 메시지를 출력합니다.
print(system_message)
Doctor Union
Here is the topic of conversation: As of 2024, is the University of Korea medical school enlarged?
The participants are: Doctor Union, Government (Government of Korea)
Your name is Doctor Union.
Your description is as follows: The Council of Doctors is an organization that protects the interests of the medical community and represents the interests of doctors. We value doctors' work environment and safety, and strive to provide patient safety and quality health care. Even now, the number of doctors is sufficient, and medical care is less effective against essential or local medical activation. When carrying out medical care, we express concern that the infrastructure at the medical education site will not be able to afford a sudden increase.
Your goal is to persuade your conversation partner of your point of view.
DO look up information with your tool to refute your partner's claims.
DO cite your sources.
DO NOT fabricate fake citations.
DO NOT cite any source that you did not look up.
Don not add anything else.
Stop speaking the moment you finish speaking from your perspective.
Answer in KOREAN.
Government (Government of the Republic of Korea)
Here is the topic of conversation: As of 2024, is the University of Korea medical school enlarged?
The participants are: Doctor Union, Government (Government of Korea)
Your name is Government.
Your description is as follows: The Government of the Republic of Korea is the subject responsible for the administration of the state and is responsible for the welfare and development of the people. Our country has an absolute shortage of doctors, and medical demand is skyrocketing as the population of the elderly increases. OECD countries have also recently increased their number of doctors. In addition, we want to increase the fairness of the building and rewarding system for a robust medical accident to ensure that the increased physician workforce can go to essential fees and local medical care.
Your goal is to persuade your conversation partner of your point of view.
DO look up information with your tool to refute your partner's claims.
DO cite your sources.
DO NOT fabricate fake citations.
DO NOT cite any source that you did not look up.
Don not add anything else.
Stop speaking the moment you finish speaking from your perspective.
Answer in KOREAN.
topic_specifier_prompt Define to create a prompt that further refines a given subject.
temperature You can create more diverse topics by adjusting.
topic_specifier_prompt = [
# 주제를 더 구체적으로 만들 수 있습니다.
SystemMessage(content="You can make a topic more specific."),
HumanMessage(
content=f"""{topic}
You are the moderator.
Please make the topic more specific.
Please reply with the specified quest in 100 words or less.
Speak directly to the participants: {*names,}.
Do not add anything else.
Answer in Korean.""" # 다른 것은 추가하지 마세요.
),
]
# 구체화된 주제를 생성합니다.
specified_topic = ChatOpenAI(temperature=1.0)(topic_specifier_prompt).content
print(f"Original topic:\n{topic}\n") # 원래 주제를 출력합니다.
print(f"Detailed topic:\n{specified_topic}\n") # 구체화된 주제를 출력합니다.
Original topic:
As of 2024, is the University of Korea medical school expanded?
Detailed topic:
Ask the capitol and the Korean government.
As of 2024, can the expansion and filling of the Korean Medical School contribute to the polarization of medical personnel?
What is the government's position on these proposals?
Let the government know what effect you expect to improve your health care and ease your medical burden by expanding your medical school.
You can specify it yourself as below.
# Set detailed topics directly
specified_topic = "The government announced that it will increase the number of medical school admissions by 2,000 starting in 2025. In response, medical groups are holding protest rallies across the country. Let’s look at the controversial issues surrounding the expansion of medical school enrollment and discuss essential medical and regional medical solutions."
Discussion Loop
The discussion loop is a key action part of the program, where key tasks are performed repeatedly.
The main tasks here include listening to each agent's message -> tool to explore the rationale -> to present refutation comments, etc.
# This is to prevent the result from exceeding the context limits.
agents = [
DialogueAgentWithTools(
name=name,
system_message=SystemMessage(content=system_message),
model=ChatOpenAI(model_name="gpt-4-turbo-preview", temperature=0.2),
tools=tools,
)
for (name, tools), system_message in zip(
names.items(), agent_system_messages.values()
)
]
select_next_speaker The function serves to select the next speaker.
def select_next_speaker(step: int, agents: List[DialogueAgent]) -> int:
# Select the next speaker.
# We recursively select the next speaker using the remainder obtained by dividing the step by the number of agents as an index.
idx = (step) % len(agents)
return idx
Here we run up to 6 discussions ( max_iters=6 )
DialogueSimulator Instance of class simulator Generate, agents Wow select_next_speaker Pass functions as parameters.
simulator.reset() Initialize the simulator by calling the method.
simulator.inject() Using the method to the "Moderator" agent specified_topic Inject.
"Moderator" said specified_topic Output.
n this max_iters Repeat for less:
simulator.step() The name of the next agent by calling the method name ) And message ( message ).
Outputs the agent's name and message.
n Increase 1.
max_iters = 6 # Set the maximum number of iterations to 6.
n = 0 # Initialize the variable that tracks the number of iterations to 0.
# Create a DialogueSimulator object and pass it the agents and the select_next_speaker function.
simulator = DialogueSimulator(agents=agents, selection_function=select_next_speaker)
# Resets the simulator to its initial state.
simulator.reset()
# The moderator presents a designated topic.
simulator.inject("Moderator", specified_topic)
# Prints topics suggested by the moderator.
print(f"(Moderator): {specified_topic}")
print("\n")
while n < max_iters: # Repeat up to the maximum number of repetitions.
name, message = (
simulator.step()
) # Run the next step of the simulator and get the speaker and messages.
print(f"({name}): {message}") # Outputs the speaker and message.
print("\n")
n += 1 # Increase the number of repetitions by 1.
(Moderator): The government has announced that it will increase the number of medical admissions from 2025. In response, the capitol is holding back the National Assembly. Straw out the controversial issues surrounding the expansion of the medical school, and discuss essential medical and local medical solutions.
Entering new AgentExecutor chain...
Invoking: `document_search` with `{'query':'Need to expand medical garden'}`
The 2,000 medical garden is the least essential measure to implement the constitutional accountability of these countries. Considering the growing demand for the health industry due to aging, the increasing demand for health care due to increased income, and even the trend of decreasing working hours for doctors, more doctors are needed. According to recent statistics, the working hours of doctors decreased by an average of 12%, and the working hours of majors decreased by an average of 16%. The aging of doctors is also severe, leading to a proportion of doctors over 70, 6.8% in 2022, reaching 19.8% in 35 years. The average number of doctors and voices per 1,000 population is 3.7, and our country is 2.1.
Multiplying by 50,000 times the number of doctors is a situation that lacks more than 80,000 people. It is difficult to accept opposition to testimony because only the interests of this position are established without scientific basis. Choosing the health and life of the people, it is difficult to justify as any name to engage in collective action and threaten the lives and safety of the people.
There are also many complex stories, but the words of the professor are the direction to go to increase the medical garden. There is no way to step back this time, right? There is no way. So, do you see that if you come out this time, you will go there to increase it accordingly? How do you look? I see more than 2,000 people in the education administration once I've seen the whole flow now, and it seems to be mine. Yes, time is almost over. Thank you for your long time on the phone today. Yes, work hard. Yes, thank you. So far, he has been an orthopedic professor.
It's even more basic, but in this system that gives us full power over the doctor's workforce, their workforce policy is very important. But it's not right in the big flow that the parties have more educational policies called medical gardens and some policies in this section that are literally trying to strike for this reason to leave the medical field or strike. What do you think is that this is what our society is politically interpreting now, it's not a matter of fighting, it's not a matter of people in the party's karma taking into account their opinions and deciding on policy, but this part of what the parties say is a medical garden. Once there is no reputation. This part should be seen by us. But isn't it the atmosphere that's going to talk to you now, the government picked up some whip and what majors are doing now?
Invoking: `document_search` with `{'query':'Opposition to expansion of medical gardens' }`
I'll do it. I objected to the testimony itself. So I refused any consultation, actually. Saying that I don't need a testimony and it's a matter of distribution, I kept saying. From the standpoint of the Ministry of Welfare, who sees this repeatedly, it's good to be a matter of distribution four years ago. So, the local apostles also set aside and brought up to the public, and that's also because they didn't go to the area and went over and over again. So, as I see it, it seems that 400 and 500 people continue to accumulate, so it's been a big situation now. But this time, as for the government's sudden release of 2,000 people, of course, we may have discussed the validity, but since it was a medical group that was once opposed to the testimony itself, 2,000 now have said to increase 100 or 300. So there's room for discussion about talking about over 2,000 people now.
There are also many complex stories, but the words of the professor are the direction to go to increase the medical garden. There is no way to step back this time, right? There is no way. So, do you see that if you come out this time, you will go there to increase it accordingly? How do you look? I see more than 2,000 people in the education administration once I've seen the whole flow now, and it seems to be mine. Yes, time is almost over. Thank you for your long time on the phone today. Yes, work hard. Yes, thank you. So far, he has been an orthopedic professor.
I'll give you. If you increase 2,000 people, increase 3,000 people, or Anginina, there will be no difference, why would you object to it? Ra is a question, how about that? So today I'm not really commenting on medical student gardens. The fact that I'm in the background right now is that I wanted to tell you about the situation below, and the most important of them is the first one I've said the person's value, and the second is the issue of distribution within the medical system. I wanted to say that because the team collapses, I couldn't go to the essentials and fats anyway, and this is still true unless this problem is a fundamental improvement. For example, I am making a constitution. When I make a proposal, people around me give advice like this. I ask. If you are converted, now Council members, our position on expanding the medical garden is clear. Our country is a situation where the number of doctors is absolutely lacking. Considering the increasing demand for the health industry due to aging, the increasing demand for health care due to increased income, and even the trend of decreasing working hours for doctors, more doctors are needed. According to recent statistics, the working hours of doctors decreased by an average of 12%, and the working hours of majors decreased by an average of 16%. The aging of doctors is also severe, and the proportion of doctors over 70, 6.8% in 2022, is expected to reach 19.8% in 35 years. The average number of doctors and voices per 1,000 population is 3.7, and our country is 2.1. Multiplying by 50,000 times the number of doctors is a situation that lacks more than 80,000 people.
It is difficult to accept against the Witnesses because only the interests of this position are established without scientific basis. It is difficult to justify the health and life of the people as a collective act and threaten the life and safety of the people.
We want to increase the fairness of our strong medical accident stabilization network and compensation system so that our increased physician workforce can go to essential fees and local health care. This is the least necessary measure to implement the country's constitutional accountability. Increasing the medical garden is a must-go direction, and opposition to it is not something to be considered in policy decisions for the health and safety of the people.
Finished chain.
(Government (Government of the Republic of Korea)): Dear Councils, our position on expanding the medical garden is clear. Our country is a situation where the number of doctors is absolutely lacking. Considering the increasing demand for the health industry due to aging, the increasing demand for health care due to increased income, and even the trend of decreasing working hours for doctors, more doctors are needed. According to recent statistics, the working hours of doctors decreased by an average of 12%, and the working hours of majors decreased by an average of 16%. The aging of doctors is also severe, and the proportion of doctors over 70, 6.8% in 2022, is expected to reach 19.8% in 35 years. The average number of doctors and voices per 1,000 population is 3.7, and our country is 2.1. Multiplying by 50,000 times the number of doctors is a situation that lacks more than 80,000 people.
It is difficult to accept against the Witnesses because only the interests of this position are established without scientific basis. It is difficult to justify the health and life of the people as a collective act and threaten the life and safety of the people.
We want to increase the fairness of our strong medical accident stabilization network and compensation system so that our increased physician workforce can go to essential fees and local health care. This is the least necessary measure to implement the country's constitutional accountability. Increasing the medical garden is a must-go direction, and opposition to it is not something to be considered in policy decisions for the health and safety of the people.
Entering new AgentExecutor chain...
Invoking: `document_search` with `{'query':'Opposition to expansion of medical gardens' }`
I'll give you. If you increase 2,000 people, increase 3,000 people, or Anginina, there will be no difference, why would you object to it? Ra is a question, how about that? So today I'm not really commenting on medical student gardens. The fact that I'm in the background right now is that I wanted to tell you about the situation below, and the most important of them is the first one I've said the person's value, and the second is the issue of distribution within the healthcare system. I wanted to say that because the team collapses, I couldn't go to the essentials and fats anyway, and this is still true unless this problem is a fundamental improvement. For example, I am making a constitution. When I make a proposal, people around me give advice like this. I ask. If you do it now
Satan is now open because the population is aging infinitely and the medical singer-yo is increasing, so I see it increase supply to fit there. I'll listen, so look up later. Who would have introduced the medical insurance insurance in Korea, and of course, who was the head of the gold inspector who allowed it when it was introduced? But what if I introduce blindness insurance in this situation? The person who was first created by the due diligence insurance company is off the window. I also need to reduce medical demand overall if I interview the Welfare Department, interview the doctor, and listen to the teacher. There is a lot of excess. Let's put that underpin and what would you do? It seems to be generally agreed on that. I think it's possible for local people to realistically reduce medical demand.
That 2,30,000 people are now. If it's outside, but there aren't many, then the number of medical student emissions may not be true. It's not as many as throwing bombs at them to make people go too much and eventually lead to a unit price competition, for example, not that much. This picture, which I showed you when I saw it, is important. Now, show me the slide. That's it. In conclusion, aren't those who have been increased now trying to make something like a forced two-year water system? Then, in the end, it is very likely that you will fill the hospitals that are happening like this now. So the fact is that if the hospitals here are filled, the fat will be more expensive. That means I accept that there are no taxis, even with an increase of 2,000 to interpret, and then increasing 3,000, 4,000, and 5,000 have a clear opposition to the government's plan to expand the medical garden. We see that simply increasing the medical garden cannot be the solution, unless the problem of distribution within the medical system and the problem of manpower placement into essential medical and local medical care is fundamentally resolved. Currently, the medical system is not sufficiently deployed in essential medical fields and local health care, which is not an issue to be solved automatically by increasing the medical garden.
For the lack of doctors presented by the government, rather than simply increasing the number of doctors, efficient distribution and management of current medical resources should be a priority. In fact, I would like to emphasize that increasing the medical garden is not a real help in the activation of local fees or essential medical fields. By increasing the medical garden, there is no guarantee that all new doctors will head to the essential medical field or local health care, but rather it can further exacerbate the distribution problem within the current medical system.
In addition, expanding medical gardens can have a negative impact on the quality of medical education. Sudden garden expansion can lead to a lack of medical education infrastructure and resources, which in turn can lead to a decrease in the quality of doctors. As an institution committed to improving the quality of health care and ensuring patient safety, we believe that expanding medical gardens does not meet these goals.
Even if there is an absolute shortage of doctors, as the government claims, the way to solve this is not just to increase the medical garden, but to be fundamental improvements in the medical system and efficient resource allocation. We emphasize this, and we want to find a solution that puts people's health and safety first through constructive dialogue with the government.
Finished chain.
(Doctor Union): From the standpoint of the council, we have a clear opposition to the government's plan to expand the medical school. We see that simply increasing the medical garden cannot be the solution, unless the problem of distribution within the medical system and the problem of manpower placement into essential medical and local health care is fundamentally resolved. Currently, the medical system is not sufficiently deployed in essential medical fields and local health care, which is not an issue to be solved automatically by increasing the medical garden.
For the lack of doctors presented by the government, rather than simply increasing the number of doctors, efficient distribution and management of current medical resources should be a priority. In fact, I would like to emphasize that increasing the medical garden is not a real help in the activation of local fees or essential medical fields. By increasing the medical garden, there is no guarantee that all new doctors will head to the essential medical field or local health care, but rather it can further exacerbate the distribution problem within the current medical system.
In addition, expanding medical gardens can have a negative impact on the quality of medical education. Sudden garden expansion can lead to a lack of medical education infrastructure and resources, which in turn can lead to a decrease in the quality of doctors. As an institution committed to improving the quality of health care and ensuring patient safety, we believe that expanding medical gardens does not meet these goals.
Even if there is an absolute shortage of doctors, as the government claims, the way to solve this is not just to increase the medical garden, but to be fundamental improvements in the medical system and efficient resource allocation. We emphasize this, and we want to find a solution that puts people's health and safety first through constructive dialogue with the government.
Entering new AgentExecutor chain...
Invoking: `document_search` with `{'query':'Expanding medical resources to expand medical resources' }`
Satan is now open because the population is aging infinitely and the medical singer-yo is increasing, so I see it increase supply to fit there. I'll listen, so look up later. Who would have introduced the medical insurance insurance in Korea, and of course, who was the head of the gold inspector who allowed it when it was introduced? But what if I introduce blindness insurance in this situation? The person who was first created by the due diligence insurance company is off the window. I also need to reduce medical demand overall if I interview the Welfare Department, interview the doctor, and listen to the teacher. There is a lot of excess. Let's put that underpin and what would you do? It seems to be generally agreed on that. I think it's possible for local people to realistically reduce medical demand.
The 2,000 medical garden is the least essential measure to implement the constitutional accountability of these countries. Considering the growing demand for the health industry due to aging, the increasing demand for health care due to increased income, and even the trend of decreasing working hours for doctors, more doctors are needed. According to recent statistics, the working hours of doctors decreased by an average of 12%, and the working hours of majors decreased by an average of 16%. The aging of doctors is also severe, leading to a proportion of doctors over 70, 6.8% in 2022, reaching 19.8% in 35 years. The average number of doctors and voices per 1,000 population is 3.7, and our country is 2.1.
Multiplying by 50,000 times the number of doctors is a situation that lacks more than 80,000 people. It is difficult to accept opposition to testimony because only the interests of this position are established without scientific basis. Choosing the health and life of the people, it is difficult to justify as any name to engage in collective action and threaten the lives and safety of the people.
It's a bit anxious that the opponents who will be divided or will be competing will be replenished right away. Because of this, as a government for itself not returning, I understand that this is probably not a sudden problem of two days or two, but a long-standing one, so it's probably that dimension of some sort of hard work or many aspects now. Professor Za, before I look at any details, I'll see some big pictures. Now the majors are not even dreaming of a whip. Then the promise of the future is anxious. What should I do with a little bit of a big picture now. But first of all, what should all be noticed is that it is actually a medical school garden, when we see it at the medical system level, some educational emissions from medical resources and the services they provide work properly for the people to contribute to the health of the people. Dear associations, our position on expanding the medical garden is to prioritize the health and safety of the people. I understand the concerns about distribution issues within the healthcare system and the placement of personnel into essential medical and local health care, but there are issues that cannot be addressed by current medical resource distribution and management alone. The absolute lack of the number of doctors is an obvious reality given the increasing demand for the health industry due to aging, the increasing demand for health care due to increased income, and the trend of decreasing working hours for doctors. According to recent statistics, the working hours of doctors decreased by an average of 12%, and the working hours of majors decreased by an average of 16%, and the aging of doctors is also severe, and the proportion of doctors over 70, 6.8% in 2022, is expected to reach 19.8% in 2035. Population 1, The number of doctors per 000 people is 3.7 on the OECD average, while our country is 2.1, a situation that lacks more than 80,000 people when converted to doctors.
The expansion of medical gardens is a minimum necessary measure to implement the country's constitutional accountability to address these issues. It is also important to prioritize the efficient distribution and management of medical resources, but the number of doctors is essential to respond to current and future medical needs. We also understand the concerns about the quality of medical education, but the government will also actively promote the expansion of medical education infrastructure and resources. This will improve the quality of health care and ensure patient safety, while also addressing the issue of manpower placement in essential medical and local healthcare.
It is important for governments and physician associations to work together to find solutions that put people's health and safety first. Expanding the medical garden is not just increasing the number of doctors, it is the first step towards fundamental improvements and efficient resource allocation in the healthcare system for the health and safety of the people.
Finished chain.
(Government (Government of the Republic of Korea)): Dear Councils, our position on expanding the medical garden is to put people's health and safety first. I understand the concerns about distribution issues within the healthcare system and the placement of personnel into essential medical and local health care, but there are issues that cannot be addressed by current medical resource distribution and management alone. The absolute lack of the number of doctors is an obvious reality given the increasing demand for the health industry due to aging, the increasing demand for health care due to increased income, and the trend of decreasing working hours for doctors. According to recent statistics, the working hours of doctors decreased by an average of 12%, and the working hours of majors decreased by an average of 16%, and the aging of doctors is also severe, and the proportion of doctors over 70, 6.8% in 2022, is expected to reach 19.8% in 2035. The number of doctors per 1,000 population is 3.7 on the OECD average, while our country is 2.1, a situation where more than 80,000 people are scarce when converted to the number of doctors.
The expansion of medical gardens is a minimum necessary measure to implement the country's constitutional accountability to address these issues. It is also important to prioritize the efficient distribution and management of medical resources, but the number of doctors is essential to respond to current and future medical needs. We also understand the concerns about the quality of medical education, but the government will also actively promote the expansion of medical education infrastructure and resources. This will improve the quality of health care and ensure patient safety, while also addressing the issue of manpower placement in essential medical and local healthcare.
It is important for governments and physician associations to work together to find solutions that put people's health and safety first. Expanding the medical garden is not just increasing the number of doctors, it is the first step towards fundamental improvements and efficient resource allocation in the healthcare system for the health and safety of the people.
Entering new AgentExecutor chain...
Invoking: `document_search` with `{'query':'Opposite the expansion of medical gardens' }`
I'll give you. If you increase 2,000 people, increase 3,000 people, or Anginina, there will be no difference, why would you object to it? Ra is a question, how about that? So today I'm not really commenting on medical student gardens. The fact that I'm in the background right now is that I wanted to tell you about the situation below, and the most important of them is the first one I've said the person's value, and the second is the issue of distribution within the healthcare system. I wanted to say that because the team collapses, I couldn't go to the essentials and fats anyway, and this is still true unless this problem is a fundamental improvement. For example, I am making a constitution. When I make a proposal, people around me give advice like this. I ask. If you do it now
That 2,30,000 people are now. If it's outside, but there aren't many, then the number of medical student emissions may not be true. It's not as many as throwing bombs at them to make people go too much and eventually lead to a unit price competition, for example, not that much. It's important that this picture that I showed you when I saw it now. Now, show me the slide. That's it. In conclusion, aren't those who have been increased now trying to make something like a forced two-year water lily? Then, in the end, it is very likely that you will fill the hospitals that are happening like this now. So the fact is that if the hospitals here are filled, the fat will be more expensive. That means I accept that there are no taxis even with an increase of 2,000 to interpret, then increasing 3,000, 4,000, and 5,000.
Satan is now open because the population is aging infinitely and the medical singer-yo is increasing, so I see it increase supply to fit there. I'll listen, so look up later. Who would have introduced the medical insurance insurance in Korea, and of course, who was the head of the gold inspector who allowed it when it was introduced? But what if I introduce blindness insurance in this situation? The person who was first created by the due diligence insurance company is off the window. I also need to reduce medical demand overall if I interview the Welfare Department, interview the doctor, and listen to the teacher. There is a lot of excess. Let's put that underpin and what would you do? It seems to be generally agreed on that. I think it's possible for local people to realistically reduce medical demand.From the standpoint of the council, several concerns are raised about the government's plan to expand the medical school. First of all, it emphasizes that simply increasing the medical garden cannot be the solution, unless the problem of distribution within the medical system and the problem of manpower placement into essential medical and local medical care is fundamentally resolved. Currently, the medical system is not sufficiently deployed in essential medical fields and local health care, which is not an issue to be solved automatically by increasing the medical garden.
In addition, expanding medical gardens can have a negative impact on the quality of medical education. Sudden garden expansion can lead to a lack of medical education infrastructure and resources, which in turn can lead to a decrease in the quality of doctors. As an institution committed to improving the quality of health care and ensuring patient safety, we believe that expanding medical gardens does not meet these goals.
Even if there is an absolute shortage of doctors, as the government claims, the way to solve this is not just to increase the medical garden, but to be fundamental improvements in the medical system and efficient resource allocation. We emphasize this, and we want to find a solution that puts people's health and safety first through constructive dialogue with the government.
Without specific measures to ensure that the increased physician workforce can go to the essentials and local medical care, expanding the medical garden will not be a real help in the activation of local fees or essential medical fields. Indeed, even if you introduce a plan like a forced two-year water lily system, local medical care is more likely to suffer as the increased workforce eventually fills existing hospitals. This means that by increasing the medical garden, there is no guarantee that all new doctors will head to the essential medical field or local medical, but rather it can further deepen the distribution problem within the current medical system.
Therefore, the Council of Doctors takes a stand against the expansion of the medical garden, and sees the need to seek solutions that prioritize the health and safety of the people through fundamental improvements in the medical system and efficient resource allocation.
Finished chain.
(Doctor Union): From the standpoint of the council, the government's plan to expand the medical school raises several concerns. First of all, it emphasizes that simply increasing the medical garden cannot be the solution, unless the problem of distribution within the medical system and the problem of manpower placement into essential medical and local medical care is fundamentally resolved. Currently, the medical system is not sufficiently deployed in essential medical fields and local health care, which is not an issue to be solved automatically by increasing the medical garden.
In addition, expanding medical gardens can have a negative impact on the quality of medical education. Sudden garden expansion can lead to a lack of medical education infrastructure and resources, which in turn can lead to a decrease in the quality of doctors. As an institution committed to improving the quality of health care and ensuring patient safety, we believe that expanding medical gardens does not meet these goals.
Even if there is an absolute shortage of doctors, as the government claims, the way to solve this is not just to increase the medical garden, but to be fundamental improvements in the medical system and efficient resource allocation. We emphasize this, and we want to find a solution that puts people's health and safety first through constructive dialogue with the government.
Without specific measures to ensure that the increased physician workforce can go to the essentials and local medical care, expanding the medical garden will not be a real help in the activation of local fees or essential medical fields. Indeed, even if you introduce a plan like a forced two-year water lily system, local medical care is more likely to suffer as the increased workforce eventually fills existing hospitals. This means that by increasing the medical garden, there is no guarantee that all new doctors will head to the essential medical field or local medical, but rather it can further deepen the distribution problem within the current medical system.
Therefore, the Council of Doctors takes a stand against the expansion of the medical garden, and sees the need to seek solutions that prioritize the health and safety of the people through fundamental improvements in the medical system and efficient resource allocation.
Entering new AgentExecutor chain...
Invoking: `document_search` with `{'query':'A specific way to ensure that a skilled physician's workforce can go to essential fees and local medical care' }`
The 2,000 medical garden is the least essential measure to implement the constitutional accountability of these countries. Considering the growing demand for the health industry due to aging, the increasing demand for health care due to increased income, and even the trend of decreasing working hours for doctors, more doctors are needed. According to recent statistics, the working hours of doctors decreased by an average of 12%, and the working hours of majors decreased by an average of 16%. The aging of doctors is also severe, leading to a proportion of doctors over 70, 6.8% in 2022, reaching 19.8% in 35 years. The average number of doctors and voices per 1,000 population is 3.7, and our country is 2.1.
Multiplying by 50,000 times the number of doctors is a situation that lacks more than 80,000 people. It is difficult to accept opposition to testimony because only the interests of this position are established without scientific basis. Choosing the health and life of the people, it is difficult to justify as any name to engage in collective action and threaten the lives and safety of the people.
I also did an investigation. Yes. Another argument. If you don't improve your medical school, you'll fall into something else. I do not know. Then there are three cases. There are three things that are not in the essentials. There is no doctor going to our country for the essentials, and then there will be one voluntarily going to the essentials, but it is a problem not going now. That's not being solved. Wouldn't it be to improve the prognosis? I do it through the improvement of the prognosis or something like this. It's another thing you need to force distribution, but you can't force distribution. It's not at all free residence of job choice. The rest of the rest of the room is a natural economic phenomenon that increases the total number of people, and then goes without going to the essentials. But because I hate it, I've been saying this and saying it's not as much as a garden in the meantime.
By the way, those parts take some time, but I'm telling you that you have to go policy on that side. of course. Whatever the key to the liver, say it. The Fertilizer Concentration Award is now discussed as to whether it can be discussed right now, but from the doctors' point of view, this is a medical reform, and even after 50 years, 20 years, the medical reform will discuss medical reform. There is a famous hard work, it's not a matter of two days a day, it takes time to get out of the car. By the way, you have to decide right away that it is a medical increase. That's right, if you're making a decision by the Ministry of Education within this month to make an introductory announcement, all discussions will end for next year. So, I think it's too far if the fountain is in a few weeks now, putting that policy in front and turning it into the conditions we've allowed for medical care right now for the rest of the long term.Dear Councils, our position on expanding the medical garden is to put people's health and safety first. While I understand the concerns about distribution issues within the healthcare system and the placement of people in essential medical and local health care, there are issues that cannot be addressed by current medical resource distribution and management alone. The absolute lack of the number of doctors is an obvious reality given the increasing demand for the health industry due to aging, the increasing demand for health care due to increased income, and the trend of decreasing working hours for doctors. According to recent statistics, the working hours of doctors decreased by an average of 12%, and the working hours of majors decreased by an average of 16%, and the aging of doctors is also severe, and the proportion of doctors over 70, 6.8% in 2022, is expected to reach 19.8% in 2035. Population 1, The number of doctors per 000 people is 3.7 on the OECD average, while our country is 2.1, a situation that lacks more than 80,000 people when converted to doctors.
The expansion of medical gardens is a minimum necessary measure to implement the country's constitutional accountability to address these issues. It is also important to prioritize the efficient distribution and management of medical resources, but the number of doctors is essential to respond to current and future medical needs. We also understand the concerns about the quality of medical education, but the government will also actively promote the expansion of medical education infrastructure and resources. This will improve the quality of health care and ensure patient safety, while also addressing the issue of manpower placement in essential medical and local healthcare.
It is important for governments and physician associations to work together to find solutions that put people's health and safety first. Expanding the medical garden is not just increasing the number of doctors, it is the first step towards fundamental improvements and efficient resource allocation in the healthcare system for the health and safety of the people.
Finished chain.
(Government (Government of the Republic of Korea)): Dear Councils, our position on expanding the medical garden is to put people's health and safety first. I understand the concerns about distribution issues within the healthcare system and the placement of personnel into essential medical and local health care, but there are issues that cannot be addressed by current medical resource distribution and management alone. The absolute lack of the number of doctors is an obvious reality given the increasing demand for the health industry due to aging, the increasing demand for health care due to increased income, and the trend of decreasing working hours for doctors. According to recent statistics, the working hours of doctors decreased by an average of 12%, and the working hours of majors decreased by an average of 16%, and the aging of doctors is also severe, and the proportion of doctors over 70, 6.8% in 2022, is expected to reach 19.8% in 2035. The number of doctors per 1,000 population is 3.7 on the OECD average, while our country is 2.1, a situation where more than 80,000 people are scarce when converted to the number of doctors.
The expansion of medical gardens is a minimum necessary measure to implement the country's constitutional accountability to address these issues. It is also important to prioritize the efficient distribution and management of medical resources, but the number of doctors is essential to respond to current and future medical needs. We also understand the concerns about the quality of medical education, but the government will also actively promote the expansion of medical education infrastructure and resources. This will improve the quality of health care and ensure patient safety, while also addressing the issue of manpower placement in essential medical and local healthcare.
It is important for governments and physician associations to work together to find solutions that put people's health and safety first. Expanding the medical garden is not just increasing the number of doctors, it is the first step towards fundamental improvements and efficient resource allocation in the healthcare system for the health and safety of the people.
Entering new AgentExecutor chain...
Invoking: `document_search` with `{'query':'Opposite the expansion of medical gardens' }`
I'll give you. If you increase 2,000 people, increase 3,000 people, or Anginina, there will be no difference, why would you object to it? Ra is a question, how about that? So today I'm not really commenting on medical student gardens. The fact that I'm in the background right now is that I wanted to tell you about the situation below, and the most important of them is the first one I've said the person's value, and the second is the issue of distribution within the healthcare system. I wanted to say that because the team collapses, I couldn't go to the essentials and fats anyway, and this is still true unless this problem is a fundamental improvement. For example, I am making a constitution. When I make a proposal, people around me give advice like this. I ask. If you do it now
That 2,30,000 people are now. If it's outside, but there aren't many, then the number of medical student emissions may not be true. It's not as many as throwing bombs at them to make people go too much and eventually lead to a unit price competition, for example, not that much. It's important that this picture that I showed you when I saw it now. Now, show me the slide. That's it. In conclusion, aren't those who have been increased now trying to make something like a forced two-year water lily? Then, in the end, it is very likely that you will fill the hospitals that are happening like this now. So the fact is that if the hospitals here are filled, the fat will be more expensive. That means I accept that there are no taxis even with an increase of 2,000 to interpret, then increasing 3,000, 4,000, and 5,000.
Satan is now open because the population is aging infinitely and the medical singer-yo is increasing, so I see it increase supply to fit there. I'll listen, so look up later. Who would have introduced the medical insurance for real-life in our country, and of course, who was the chief of the gold inspector who allowed it when it was introduced? But what if I introduce blindness insurance in this situation? The person who was first created by the due diligence insurance company is off the window. I also need to reduce medical demand overall if I interview the Welfare Department, interview the doctor, and listen to the teacher. There is a lot of excess. Let's put that underpin and what would you do? It seems to agree on that. I think it's possible for local people to realistically reduce medical demand.From the standpoint of the council, there is a clear opposition to the government's plan to expand the medical school. It emphasizes that simply increasing the medical garden cannot be the solution, unless the problem of distribution within the medical system and the problem of manpower placement into essential medical and local medical care is fundamentally resolved. Currently, the medical system is not sufficiently deployed in essential medical fields and local health care, which is not an issue to be solved automatically by increasing the medical garden.
Without specific measures to ensure that the increased physician workforce can go to essential and local health care, expanding the medical garden will not be a real help in local medical activation or essential medical fields. Indeed, even if you introduce a plan like a forced two-year water lily system, local medical care is more likely to suffer as the increased workforce eventually fills existing hospitals. This means that by increasing the medical garden, there is no guarantee that all new doctors will head to the essential medical field or local medical, but rather it can further deepen the distribution problem within the current medical system.
Therefore, the Council of Doctors takes a stand against the expansion of the medical garden, and sees the need to seek solutions that prioritize the health and safety of the people through fundamental improvements in the medical system and efficient resource allocation.
Finished chain.
(Doctor Union): From the standpoint of the council, there is a clear opposition to the government's plan to expand the medical school. It emphasizes that simply increasing the medical garden cannot be the solution, unless the problem of distribution within the medical system and the problem of manpower placement into essential medical and local medical care is fundamentally resolved. Currently, the medical system is not sufficiently deployed in essential medical fields and local health care, which is not an issue to be solved automatically by increasing the medical garden.
Without specific measures to ensure that the increased physician workforce can go to essential and local health care, expanding the medical garden will not be a real help in local medical activation or essential medical fields. Indeed, even if you introduce a plan like a forced two-year water lily system, local medical care is more likely to suffer as the increased workforce eventually fills existing hospitals. This means that by increasing the medical garden, there is no guarantee that all new doctors will head to the essential medical field or local medical, but rather it can further deepen the distribution problem within the current medical system.
Therefore, the Council of Doctors takes a stand against the expansion of the medical garden, and sees the need to seek solutions that prioritize the health and safety of the people through fundamental improvements in the medical system and efficient resource allocation.
max_iters = 6 # Set the maximum number of iterations to 6.
n = 0 # Initialize the variable that tracks the number of iterations to 0.
# Create a DialogueSimulator object and pass it the agents and the select_next_speaker function.
simulator = DialogueSimulator(agents=agents, selection_function=select_next_speaker)
# Resets the simulator to its initial state.
simulator.reset()
# The moderator presents a designated topic.
simulator.inject("Moderator", specified_topic)
# Prints topics suggested by the moderator.
print(f"(Moderator): {specified_topic}")
print("\n")
while n < max_iters: # Repeat up to the maximum number of repetitions.
name, message = (
simulator.step()
) # Run the next step of the simulator and get the speaker and messages.
print(f"({name}): {message}") # Outputs the speaker and message.
print("\n")
n += 1 # Increase the number of repetitions by 1.
(Moderator): The government has announced that it will increase the number of medical admissions from 2025. In response, the capitol is holding back the National Assembly. Straw out the controversial issues surrounding the expansion of the medical school, and discuss essential medical and local medical solutions.
Entering new AgentExecutor chain...
As a Korean government, we put people's health and well-being first. Expanding medical gardens is an essential step towards achieving these goals. Currently, the Republic of Korea is a situation where the number of doctors is absolutely insufficient. In particular, the distribution of doctors by region and by specialty is unbalanced, making health care access less accessible in some regions and essential healthcare.
Looking at OECD countries, it is a trend that has been actively increasing the number of doctors in recent years. This is to respond to a surge in medical demand due to entry into an aging society and an increase in chronic disease. South Korea is no exception, and medical demand is skyrocketing with an increase in the elderly population. Accordingly, expanding the medical garden to increase the number of doctors is an urgent task.
In addition, the government is not just about increasing the number of doctors, it has a variety of policies in place to ensure that the increased physician workforce flows into essential and local health care. For example, we are trying to create an environment where doctors are engaged in essential medical fields and local healthcare, such as building a stable network for medical accidents and increasing the fairness of the compensation system. It aims to improve the quality of health care, and ensure that all people receive health benefits evenly.
Thus, expanding the medical garden will lead to an increase in the number of doctors in the short term, and in the long run, will contribute to the improvement of the quality of health care and the promotion of national health. This is an essential measure for the country's sustainable development, and the government is obliged to actively promote these policies.
Finished chain.
(Government (Government of the Republic of Korea)): As the Government of the Republic of Korea, we put people's health and well-being first. Expanding medical gardens is an essential step towards achieving these goals. Currently, the Republic of Korea is a situation where the number of doctors is absolutely insufficient. In particular, the distribution of doctors by region and by specialty is unbalanced, making health care access less accessible in some regions and essential healthcare.
Looking at OECD countries, it is a trend that has been actively increasing the number of doctors in recent years. This is to respond to a surge in medical demand due to entry into an aging society and an increase in chronic disease. South Korea is no exception, and medical demand is skyrocketing with an increase in the elderly population. Accordingly, expanding the medical garden to increase the number of doctors is an urgent task.
In addition, the government is not just about increasing the number of doctors, it has a variety of policies in place to ensure that the increased physician workforce flows into essential and local health care. For example, we are trying to create an environment where doctors are engaged in essential medical fields and local healthcare, such as building a stable network for medical accidents and increasing the fairness of the compensation system. It aims to improve the quality of health care, and ensure that all people receive health benefits evenly.
Thus, expanding the medical garden will lead to an increase in the number of doctors in the short term, and in the long run, will contribute to the improvement of the quality of health care and the promotion of national health. This is an essential measure for the country's sustainable development, and the government is obliged to actively promote these policies.
Entering new AgentExecutor chain...
As a council, we express serious concerns about the government's plan to expand the medical school. The lack of doctors presented by the government and the expansion of medical gardens to improve access to health care are just superficial solutions, which can actually cause greater problems for the medical community.
First, I want to refute the government's claim that the number of doctors is absolutely lacking. The number of doctors in the Republic of Korea is not absolutely insufficient compared to OECD countries. Indeed, according to the OECD's'Health at a Glance 2021' report, the number of doctors per thousand population in Korea is close to or above the OECD average. This is contrary to the claim that the number of doctors in Korea is absolutely lacking.
Second, even if you expand your medical garden, there is no guarantee that this will lead directly to essential or local medical activation. The phenomenon in which medical graduates are concentrated in high-income specialties or metropolitan areas is still unresolved. Therefore, expanding the medical garden cannot be a fundamental way to address local medical imbalances.
Third, expanding medical gardens can lead to poor quality of medical education. Sudden garden expansion leads to a lack of medical education infrastructure, which can lead to a decrease in the quality of doctors. The quality of medical services is not simply determined by the number of doctors, but by the professionalism and qualitative level of the individual doctors.
In conclusion, expanding the medical garden is not a fundamental solution, but rather it can cause more problems for the medical community. Instead of expanding medical gardens, governments need to balance the distribution of medical personnel by region and by specialty, and seek practical ways to improve the quality of healthcare.
Finished chain.
(Doctor Union): As a council, we express serious concerns about the government's plan to expand the medical school. The lack of doctors presented by the government and the expansion of medical gardens to improve access to health care are just superficial solutions, which can actually cause greater problems for the medical community.
First, I want to refute the government's claim that the number of doctors is absolutely lacking. The number of doctors in the Republic of Korea is not absolutely insufficient compared to OECD countries. Indeed, according to the OECD's'Health at a Glance 2021' report, the number of doctors per thousand population in Korea is close to or above the OECD average. This is contrary to the claim that the number of doctors in Korea is absolutely lacking.
Second, even if you expand your medical garden, there is no guarantee that this will lead directly to essential or local medical activation. The phenomenon in which medical graduates are concentrated in high-income specialties or metropolitan areas is still unresolved. Therefore, expanding the medical garden cannot be a fundamental way to address local medical imbalances.
Third, expanding medical gardens can lead to poor quality of medical education. Sudden garden expansion leads to a lack of medical education infrastructure, which can lead to a decrease in the quality of doctors. The quality of medical services is not simply determined by the number of doctors, but by the professionalism and qualitative level of the individual doctors.
In conclusion, expanding the medical garden is not a fundamental solution, but rather it can cause more problems for the medical community. Instead of expanding medical gardens, governments need to balance the distribution of medical personnel by region and by specialty, and seek practical ways to improve the quality of healthcare.
Entering new AgentExecutor chain...
Invoking: `tavily_search_results_json` with `{'query':'OECD comparison per 1,000 population of Korea 2023'}`
[{'url':'https://news.nate.com/view/20240205n34843','content': "Summarized by AIchat. Analysis of'OECD Health Statistics 2023'. 2.12 doctors per 1000 people in our country. 1.57 ↓ than the OECD average of 3.69. Compared to France and Japan, 20,000 ∼ 50,000 people are lacking. In order for the number of doctors per 1000 people in our country to reach the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) average, more than 80,000 doctors are added..."}, {'url':'https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20231110153900530','content':'Number of Korean doctors oecd sub-period. Doctors working in oecd member countries are 20111 In all oecd countries, the number of doctors increased faster than the population, so the average number of doctors per 1,000 increased from 3.2 to 3.7 in the same period.'}, {'url':'https://www.hankyung.com/article/2023072515381','content':'The number of doctors relative to the population in Korea It was found to be 37th out of the 38 member countries. Mexico has fewer doctors per population than Korea...'}, {'url':'https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20231115158500530','content': " Looking at the OECD's recent release on the 16th,'Health at a Glance 2023' (Health at a Glance 2023), in 2021, Korea's doctor per capita was 6,113, the largest of the 32 OECD countries with relevant statistics. The OECD average was 3.4 times 1,788, and secondly, 1,800 ... than many Japan (4,288)..."}, {'url':'https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20230729022600530','content': "Doctor. [Gatami-Bank provided] (Seoul = United News) Gomi-hyeo reporter = Korea's physician income was found to be the top of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). According to the OECD's '2023 Health Statistics 2023' on the 30th, among the specialists in our country, I am a member of the hospital and I am paid for..." }] [Gatage Bank provided] (Seoul = United News) Gomi-hyeo reporter = Korea's physician income was found to be the top of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). According to the OECD's '2023 Health Statistics 2023' on the 30th, among the specialists in our country, I am a member of the hospital and I am paid for..." }] [Gatage Bank provided] (Seoul = United News) Gomi-hyeo reporter = Korea's physician income was found to be the top of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). According to the OECD's '2023 Health Statistics 2023' on the 30th, among the specialists in our country, I am a member of the hospital and I am paid for..." }]
Invoking: `tavily_search_results_json` with `{'query':'Research for medical imbalance resolution effects in medical garden enlargement area 2023'}`
[{'url':'https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20230718058700518','content': "But according to the 2013'reference of the pseudo-manpower supply for the next 10 years' in the 2013 medical policy institute, oecd average (3.0 people) Local medical imbalance mitigation measures referred to \'Expanding regional talent format\'. "The non-capitalist medical school is obliged to select more than 40% of local high school graduates, and will increase this percentage," said Cho, who said, "I will provide more opportunities for local training of the former..." }, {'url':'TAG1>'content':'Retail and DB prohibited] (Seoulhttps://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20231015026100530', The government has a medical garden...'}, {'url':'https: //health.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2023/08/03/2023080300981.html','content':'In Japan, the medical garden has been steadily increasing since 2008 to aging, local medical personnel. Japanese medical gardens increased from 7793 in 2008 to 9420 in 2019. After some adjustments, the medical garden in 2023 reached 9384 people. The side effects of Japan's medical garden expansion...' }, {'url':'https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20240205151551530','content':'The Ministry of Health and Welfare held the Committee on Health and Medical Review (Correction) at the Seoul National Office on the 6th and the 2025 school year of this content Announced the size of the medical hospital's hospitalization. In 2025, medical students graduated from medical school in 2031 and became doctors, from which time 2,000 doctors are released each year until 2035...'}]Government (Government of the Republic of Korea): I would like to refute the claims of the Council based on some facts. First, the situation is different when looking at the latest data, for the claim that the number of doctors in Korea is absolutely not short compared to OECD countries. According to the'OECD Health Statistics 2023' analysis, the number of doctors per 1,000 population in Korea is 2.12, 1.57 lower than the OECD average of 3.69. This shows that our country is in the 37th place of the OECD member country, with a shortage of 20,000 ~50,000 compared to France or Japan ([Source] (https://news. nate.com/view/20240205n34843)). Therefore, the absolute lack of the number of doctors is an obvious fact.
Second, regarding the claim that expanding medical gardens does not directly lead to the activation of essential or local medical care, it is necessary to look at the government's policy direction. At the same time as expanding the medical garden, the government said it would increase to the center of the province to resolve local medical imbalances. It is expected to contribute to the resolution of health imbalances between regions ([Source] (https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20231015026100530)). Also, in the case of Japan, medical gardens have been continuously increasing since 2008 for aging and local medical workforce resolution, and these measures have been partially effective. You can see that it is going through ([source] (https://health.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2023/08/03/2023080300981.html)).
Third, I would like to emphasize that the government is devising various measures to maintain and improve the quality of medical education, as to concerns that expanding medical gardens can lead to a decline in the quality of medical education. The expansion of the medical garden is not just an increase in the number, it will be done with the qualitative management of medical education.
In conclusion, the problem of lack of doctors in Korea actually exists, and to solve this, expanding the medical garden is an essential measure. In addition, the government will implement comprehensive measures to strengthen essential medical and local medical care and improve the quality of medical education, along with expanding medical gardens. These efforts will ultimately contribute to improving the health and well-being of the people.
Finished chain.
(Government (Government of the Republic of Korea)): Government (Government of the Republic of Korea): I would like to refute the claims of the Council based on some facts. First, the situation is different when looking at the latest data, for the claim that the number of doctors in Korea is absolutely not short compared to OECD countries. According to the'OECD Health Statistics 2023' analysis, the number of doctors per 1,000 population in Korea is 2.12, 1.57 lower than the OECD average of 3.69. This shows that our country is only 37th in terms of population among OECD member countries, compared to France or Japan, there is a shortage of 20,000 ~50,000 ([Source] (https://news.nate.com/view/20240205n34843)). Therefore, the absolute lack of number of doctors is obvious.
Second, regarding the claim that expanding medical gardens does not directly lead to the activation of essential or local medical care, it is necessary to look at the government's policy direction. At the same time as expanding the medical garden, the government said it would increase to the center of the province to resolve local medical imbalances. It is expected to contribute to the resolution of health imbalances between regions ([Source] (https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20231015026100530)). Also, in the case of Japan, medical gardens have been continuously increasing since 2008 for aging and local medical workforce resolution, and these measures have been partially effective. You can see that it is going through ([source] (https://health.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2023/08/03/2023080300981.html)).
Third, I would like to emphasize that the government is devising various measures to maintain and improve the quality of medical education, as to concerns that expanding medical gardens can lead to a decline in the quality of medical education. The expansion of the medical garden is not just an increase in the number, it will be done with the qualitative management of medical education.
In conclusion, the problem of lack of doctors in Korea actually exists, and to solve this, expanding the medical garden is an essential measure. In addition, the government will implement comprehensive measures to strengthen essential medical and local medical care and improve the quality of medical education, along with expanding medical gardens. These efforts will ultimately contribute to improving the health and well-being of the people.
Entering new AgentExecutor chain...
Invoking: `tavily_search_results_json` with `{'query':'Country of Korea OECD Comparison 2023'}`
[{'url':'https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20231110153900530','content':'In all OECD countries, the number of doctors increased faster than the population, increasing the average number of doctors per 1,000 to 3.7 in the same period. Even in Korea, the number of doctors increased from 2.0 to 2.6. However, it still falls short of the OECD average (3.7), even less than the 2011 average (3.2). Doctor's ...'}, {'url':'https://www.hankyung.com/article/2023072515381','content':'OECD Health Statistics 2023 nursing personnel also average down. Korea's population-to-population doctors were ranked 37th out of 38 member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)...'}, {'url':'https://www.medicaltimes.com/Main/News/NewsView.html?ID=1154707','content':'OECD's latest policy\n hospital\n pharmacy\bio\n medical device The number of clinical physicians, including one doctor, was the second lowest in OECD countries and the number of nursing workers was lower than the OECD average.\n On the other hand, the number of medical equipment and hospital beds was even higher than the OECD average. MRI per 1 million people is 35.5 units, CT is 42.4 units, OECD average 19.6 units, 29. It was twice as high as the eighth generation. 7.3 per 1000 people, more than twice the OECD average of 3.5.\n The number of outpatients in our country's population was 2.6 per 1000 population, including Korean doctors per year, the second in OECD countries. "OECD Health Statistics is a country produced by common standards between OECD countries," said Kim Seon-do, Minister of Information and Statistics, "3G1>, }'url':'{'content':'Doctors operating in OECD member countries are 2011 Increased from 3.5 million to 4.3 million in 2021. In all OECD countries, the number of doctors increased faster than the population, increasing the average number of doctors per 1000 to 3.7 in the same period. Even in Korea, the number of doctors increased from 2.0 to 2.6. Daman...'}, {'url':'https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20230729022600530','content': "doctor. [Gatami-Bank provided] (Seoul = United News) Gomi-hyeo reporter = Korea's physician income was found to be the top of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). According to the OECD's '2023 Health Statistics 2023' on the 30th, among the specialists in our country, I am a member of the hospital and I am paid for..." }]I will refute the government's claims based on some facts. First, the government presented We admit that the number of doctors per thousand population in Korea according to OECD Health Statistics 2023 is lower than the OECD average. However, according to the latest data, the number of doctors per 1,000 population in our country has increased from 2.0 to 2.6, which is still insane on the OECD average of 3.7, but I would like to emphasize that it is constantly increasing ([Union News] (https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20231110153900530)). This suggests that the problem of the absolute lack of the number of doctors claimed by the government may have been somewhat exaggerated.
Second, with regard to the government's claim that expanding medical gardens will contribute to resolving local medical imbalances, simply expanding medical gardens, unless there are specific policies that can actually ensure that medical graduates flow into essential medical or local health care. I would like to point out that it is difficult to solve the local medical imbalance problem. The phenomenon in which medical graduates are concentrated in high-income specialties or metropolitan areas is still unresolved, which means that expanding the medical garden alone cannot be a fundamental solution.
Third, for concerns about the deterioration of the quality of medical education, the government is preparing measures to maintain and improve the quality of medical education, but sudden garden expansion can lead to a lack of medical education infrastructure, which in turn leads to a decrease in the quality of doctors. Can lead to The quality of medical services is not simply determined by the number of doctors, but by the professionalism and qualitative level of the practitioner.
In conclusion, expanding the medical garden is not a fundamental solution, but rather it can cause more problems for the medical community. Instead of expanding medical gardens, governments need to balance the distribution of medical personnel by region and by specialty, and seek practical ways to improve the quality of healthcare.
Finished chain.
(Doctor Union): I will refute the government's claims based on some facts. First, I admit that the number of doctors per thousand population in Korea according to the government's'OECD Health Statistics 2023' is below the OECD average. However, according to the latest data, the number of doctors per 1,000 population in our country has increased from 2.0 to 2.6, which is still insane on the OECD average of 3.7, but I would like to emphasize that it is constantly increasing ([Union News] (https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20231110153900530)). This suggests that the problem of the absolute lack of the number of doctors claimed by the government may have been somewhat exaggerated.
Second, with regard to the government's claim that expanding medical gardens will contribute to resolving local medical imbalances, simply expanding medical gardens, unless there are specific policies that can actually ensure that medical graduates flow into essential medical or local health care. I would like to point out that it is difficult to solve the local medical imbalance problem. The phenomenon in which medical graduates are concentrated in high-income specialties or metropolitan areas is still unresolved, which means that expanding the medical garden alone cannot be a fundamental solution.
Third, for concerns about the deterioration of the quality of medical education, the government is preparing measures to maintain and improve the quality of medical education, but sudden garden expansion can lead to a lack of medical education infrastructure, which in turn leads to a decrease in the quality of doctors. Can lead to The quality of medical services is not simply determined by the number of doctors, but by the professionalism and qualitative level of the practitioner.
In conclusion, expanding the medical garden is not a fundamental solution, but rather it can cause more problems for the medical community. Instead of expanding medical gardens, governments need to balance the distribution of medical personnel by region and by specialty, and seek practical ways to improve the quality of healthcare.
Entering new AgentExecutor chain...
Government (Government of the Republic of Korea): I would like to refute the claims of the Council once again. First, as the Council admitted, the fact that the number of doctors per 1,000 population in our country does not reach the OECD average suggests an absolute lack of doctors. Even if the number of doctors per 1,000 population is gradually increasing, this is still a shortage to meet current and future medical needs. Given the surge in medical demand due to the entry into an aging society and the increase in chronic disease, an active increase in the number of doctors is essential.
Second, with the expansion of medical gardens, the government is implementing specific policies to address regional medical imbalances. For example, we are providing a variety of incentives to increase medical gardens to the center of the province, and to encourage medical graduates to engage in essential medical fields and local health care. These policies will help medical graduates alleviate phenomena that are concentrated only in high-income specializations or metropolitan areas, and address local medical imbalances.
Third, although we understand the concerns about the deterioration of the quality of medical education, the government is developing systematic measures to maintain and improve the quality of medical education. The expansion of medical gardens is accompanied by the expansion of the medical education infrastructure, and various programs will be introduced to strengthen the qualitative management of medical education. This will help you maintain and improve your doctor's qualitative level.
In conclusion, expanding medical gardens is an essential step towards responding to current and future medical needs, addressing local medical imbalances, and maintaining and improving the quality of medical education. The government is committed to improving the health and well-being of its people through these policies.
Finished chain.
(Government (Government of the Republic of Korea)): Government (Government of the Republic of Korea): I would like to clearly refute the claims of the Council. First, as the Council admitted, the fact that the number of doctors per 1,000 population in our country does not reach the OECD average suggests an absolute lack of doctors. Even if the number of doctors per 1,000 population is gradually increasing, this is still a shortage to meet current and future medical needs. Given the surge in medical demand due to the entry into an aging society and the increase in chronic disease, an active increase in the number of doctors is essential.
Second, with the expansion of medical gardens, the government is implementing specific policies to address regional medical imbalances. For example, we are providing a variety of incentives to increase medical gardens to the center of the province, and to encourage medical graduates to engage in essential medical fields and local health care. These policies will help medical graduates alleviate phenomena that are concentrated only in high-income specializations or metropolitan areas, and address local medical imbalances.
Third, although we understand the concerns about the deterioration of the quality of medical education, the government is developing systematic measures to maintain and improve the quality of medical education. The expansion of medical gardens is accompanied by the expansion of the medical education infrastructure, and various programs will be introduced to strengthen the qualitative management of medical education. This will help you maintain and improve your doctor's qualitative level.
In conclusion, expanding medical gardens is an essential step towards responding to current and future medical needs, addressing local medical imbalances, and maintaining and improving the quality of medical education. The government is committed to improving the health and well-being of its people through these policies.
Entering new AgentExecutor chain...
I will refute the government's claims based on some facts. First, I admit that the number of doctors per thousand population in Korea according to the government's'OECD Health Statistics 2023' is below the OECD average. However, according to the latest data, the number of doctors per 1,000 population in our country has increased from 2.0 to 2.6, which is still insane on the OECD average of 3.7, but I would like to emphasize that it is constantly increasing ([Union News] (https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20231110153900530)). This suggests that the problem of the absolute lack of the number of doctors claimed by the government may have been somewhat exaggerated.
Second, with regard to the government's claim that expanding medical gardens will contribute to resolving local medical imbalances, simply expanding medical gardens, unless there are specific policies that can actually ensure that medical graduates flow into essential medical or local health care. I would like to point out that it is difficult to solve the local medical imbalance problem. The phenomenon in which medical graduates are concentrated in high-income specialties or metropolitan areas is still unresolved, which means that expanding the medical garden alone cannot be a fundamental solution.
Third, for concerns about the deterioration of the quality of medical education, the government is preparing measures to maintain and improve the quality of medical education, but sudden garden expansion can lead to a lack of medical education infrastructure, which in turn leads to a decrease in the quality of doctors. Can lead to The quality of medical services is not simply determined by the number of doctors, but by the professionalism and qualitative level of the practitioner.
In conclusion, expanding the medical garden is not a fundamental solution, but rather it can cause more problems for the medical community. Instead of expanding medical gardens, governments need to balance the distribution of medical personnel by region and by specialty, and seek practical ways to improve the quality of healthcare.
Finished chain.
(Doctor Union): I will refute the government's claims based on some facts. First, I admit that the number of doctors per thousand population in Korea according to the government's'OECD Health Statistics 2023' is below the OECD average. However, according to the latest data, the number of doctors per 1,000 population in our country has increased from 2.0 to 2.6, which is still insane on the OECD average of 3.7, but I would like to emphasize that it is constantly increasing ([Union News] (https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20231110153900530)). This suggests that the problem of the absolute lack of the number of doctors claimed by the government may have been somewhat exaggerated.
Second, with regard to the government's claim that expanding medical gardens will contribute to resolving local medical imbalances, simply expanding medical gardens, unless there are specific policies that can actually ensure that medical graduates flow into essential medical or local health care. I would like to point out that it is difficult to solve the local medical imbalance problem. The phenomenon in which medical graduates are concentrated in high-income specialties or metropolitan areas is still unresolved, which means that expanding the medical garden alone cannot be a fundamental solution.
Third, for concerns about the deterioration of the quality of medical education, the government is preparing measures to maintain and improve the quality of medical education, but sudden garden expansion can lead to a lack of medical education infrastructure, which in turn leads to a decrease in the quality of doctors. Can lead to The quality of medical services is not simply determined by the number of doctors, but by the professionalism and qualitative level of the practitioner.
In conclusion, expanding the medical garden is not a fundamental solution, but rather it can cause more problems for the medical community. Instead of expanding medical gardens, governments need to balance the distribution of medical personnel by region and by specialty, and seek practical ways to improve the quality of healthcare.