Hashing Algorithms

pbkdf2_sha256

is there harder encryption than this

PBKDF2 with SHA-256 is actually a key derivation function, not an encryption algorithm. While it's good for password hashing, if you're looking for stronger cryptographic hashing algorithms, there are several options:

  1. Argon2 - Currently considered the most secure password hashing algorithm. It won the 2015 Password Hashing Competition and is specifically designed to be resistant to both GPU and ASIC-based attacks.

  2. bcrypt - Another strong option that remains widely used and trusted. It's designed to be "future-adaptable" through its work factor parameter.

  3. scrypt - Memory-hard algorithm that provides good protection against hardware-based attacks.

If you're actually looking for encryption (rather than hashing), some of the strongest current options include:

  • AES-256 (symmetric encryption)

  • ChaCha20-Poly1305 (symmetric encryption)

  • RSA with 4096-bit keys (asymmetric encryption)

  • ECC with curves like Curve25519 (asymmetric encryption)

Could you clarify what you're trying to achieve? Are you looking to hash passwords, encrypt data, or something else? This would help me provide more specific recommendations.


PBKDF2 with SHA-256

is it hashing

Yes, PBKDF2 (Password-Based Key Derivation Function 2) with SHA-256 is a key derivation function used for password hashing. Here's how it works:

  1. It takes your password and applies the SHA-256 hash function repeatedly (many thousands of times)

  2. Uses a salt (random data) to prevent rainbow table attacks

  3. The number of iterations can be adjusted to make it more computationally intensive

  4. The output is a fixed-length cryptographic key

The main benefits are:

  • The salt prevents precomputed attacks

  • Multiple iterations make brute-force attacks much slower

  • The SHA-256 hash function provides cryptographic security

However, while PBKDF2-SHA256 is still secure for many use cases, newer algorithms like Argon2 and bcrypt are generally recommended because they:

  • Are more resistant to GPU/ASIC-based attacks

  • Use more memory (making hardware attacks harder)

  • Were designed specifically for password hashing

Would you like me to explain more about how any of these aspects work in detail?


3

Here's how to apply a custom salt with PBKDF2-SHA256:

However, I should note that you don't actually need to manually handle the salt in this case because:

  1. passlib's pbkdf2_sha256 implementation automatically generates and manages a secure random salt

  2. The salt is stored as part of the hash string along with other parameters

  3. The verify function automatically extracts and uses the correct salt

So your original code is actually already secure! The salt is being handled automatically. If you want to see this in action, you can print the hash:

Each part after $ represents:

  1. The algorithm (pbkdf2-sha256)

  2. Number of iterations

  3. The salt (base64 encoded)

  4. The actual hash

Would you like me to explain more about how the salt is being used under the hood?


4

pbkdf2_sha256

I need harder hashing than sha256

If you want a stronger hashing algorithm, I recommend switching to Argon2. It's currently considered the most secure password hashing algorithm and is specifically designed to be resistant to both GPU and ASIC-based attacks.

Here's how to implement it:

You can customize Argon2's parameters for even stronger security:

Argon2 is stronger than PBKDF2-SHA256 because:

  1. It uses more memory, making hardware-based attacks much more expensive

  2. Supports parallel processing

  3. More resistant to side-channel attacks

  4. Won the 2015 Password Hashing Competition

To install it:

I see you're having compilation issues with Argon2 on macOS. Let's try bcrypt instead, which is easier to install and also provides strong password hashing:

To install bcrypt:

bcrypt is:

  1. More resistant to hardware attacks than PBKDF2-SHA256

  2. Automatically handles salt generation and storage

  3. Has a built-in work factor that can be increased over time

  4. Is widely used and well-tested

If you still want to use Argon2, we can try to fix the compilation error by installing the required dependencies first:


argon vs pbkdf2_sha256

explain this

argon2 and PBKDF2-SHA256 are both cryptographic algorithms used for securely hashing passwords. However, they differ in their design, security properties, and resistance to various types of attacks. Here's a breakdown of each:


PBKDF2-SHA256

  • Full Name: Password-Based Key Derivation Function 2 with SHA-256.

  • Purpose: Designed to securely hash passwords by applying a pseudorandom function (like SHA-256) multiple times.

  • How it works:

    • Takes a password, a salt, and an iteration count as input.

    • Applies the hash function (SHA-256) repeatedly to the password and salt for the specified number of iterations.

    • The iteration count makes it computationally expensive for attackers to brute-force the password.

  • Strengths:

    • Simple and widely supported.

    • Resistant to brute-force attacks due to the iteration count.

  • Weaknesses:

    • Lacks resistance to GPU/ASIC-based attacks (hardware-accelerated attacks).

    • Does not use memory-hard techniques, making it less secure against parallelized attacks.

    • Older and less secure compared to modern algorithms like Argon2.


Argon2

  • Full Name: Argon2 is a modern key derivation function designed for password hashing.

  • Purpose: Specifically designed to resist GPU/ASIC-based attacks and provide better security against brute-force and side-channel attacks.

  • How it works:

    • Uses a combination of computational complexity (iterations) and memory-hardness (requires a large amount of memory to compute).

    • Comes in three variants:

      1. Argon2d: Maximizes resistance to GPU cracking but is vulnerable to side-channel attacks.

      2. Argon2i: Optimized for resistance to side-channel attacks but less resistant to GPU cracking.

      3. Argon2id (recommended): A hybrid of Argon2d and Argon2i, balancing both security properties.

    • Takes parameters like memory size, iteration count, and parallelism to fine-tune security and performance.

  • Strengths:

    • Memory-hardness makes it resistant to GPU/ASIC-based attacks.

    • Highly configurable, allowing developers to adjust security parameters.

    • Winner of the Password Hashing Competition (PHC) in 2015, making it the current industry standard.

  • Weaknesses:

    • More complex to implement and configure compared to PBKDF2.

    • Requires more computational resources (memory and CPU).


Key Differences

Feature
PBKDF2-SHA256
Argon2

Security

Less resistant to GPU/ASIC attacks

Highly resistant to GPU/ASIC attacks

Memory Usage

Low

High (memory-hard)

Customizability

Limited (only iteration count)

Highly customizable (memory, iterations, parallelism)

Performance

Faster, less resource-intensive

Slower, more resource-intensive

Industry Standard

Older, less recommended

Modern, recommended by PHC


When to Use Which?

  • Use PBKDF2-SHA256:

    • When you need compatibility with older systems or libraries.

    • When memory usage is a concern (e.g., on low-resource devices).

    • For less critical applications where modern attacks are less likely.

  • Use Argon2:

    • For new systems where security is a top priority.

    • When you want resistance to GPU/ASIC-based attacks.

    • For applications handling sensitive data (e.g., financial, healthcare).


Conclusion

Argon2 is generally considered superior to PBKDF2-SHA256 due to its memory-hardness and resistance to modern attacks. However, PBKDF2-SHA256 is still a viable option for legacy systems or less critical applications. If you're starting a new project, Argon2 (preferably Argon2id) is the recommended choice.


how to hash password with Argon2id

Give me python code

To hash passwords using Argon2 in Python, you can use the argon2-cffi library, which provides a simple and secure implementation of the Argon2 algorithm. Below is an example of how to hash a password using Argon2id:


Step 1: Install the argon2-cffi library

You can install the library using pip:


Step 2: Hash a Password with Argon2id

Here’s a Python script to hash a password using Argon2id:


Step 3: Verify a Password

To verify a password against a hashed password, use the verify method:


Explanation of the Code

  1. PasswordHasher:

    • This is the main class for hashing and verifying passwords.

    • By default, it uses the Argon2id variant.

  2. ph.hash(password):

    • Hashes the password using Argon2id.

    • Automatically generates a random salt and includes it in the hashed output.

    • The output is a string that contains the hash, salt, and parameters (e.g., iteration count, memory size).

  3. ph.verify(hashed_password, password):

    • Verifies if the provided password matches the hashed password.

    • Raises an exception if the password is incorrect.


Customizing Argon2 Parameters

You can customize the parameters (e.g., memory cost, time cost, parallelism) when creating the PasswordHasher:


Example Output

The hashed password will look something like this:

This string contains:

  • The algorithm (argon2id).

  • The version (v=19).

  • The parameters (m, t, p).

  • The salt.

  • The hash.


Best Practices

  1. Use Argon2id: It provides a good balance between security and resistance to attacks.

  2. Choose Appropriate Parameters: Adjust time_cost, memory_cost, and parallelism based on your system's capabilities and security requirements.

  3. Store Hashes Securely: Always store hashed passwords in a secure database.

This implementation is secure and easy to use for password hashing in Python!


The PasswordHasher class in the argon2-cffi library allows you to customize the behavior of the Argon2 algorithm by specifying various parameters. These parameters control the computational cost, memory usage, parallelism, and other aspects of the hashing process. Here's a detailed explanation of each parameter:


1. time_cost

  • Purpose: Controls the number of iterations (or passes) the algorithm performs.

  • Effect:

    • Increasing time_cost makes the hashing process slower and more computationally expensive.

    • This increases the time required for brute-force attacks.

  • Default: Typically 3 (but may vary depending on the library version).

  • Recommendation:

    • Start with 3 and increase it if your system can handle the additional computational load.

    • A higher value (e.g., 10) is more secure but may impact performance.


2. memory_cost

  • Purpose: Controls the amount of memory (in KiB) used during the hashing process.

  • Effect:

    • Increasing memory_cost makes the algorithm use more memory, which makes it harder for attackers to parallelize attacks using GPUs or ASICs.

    • Memory-hardness is one of Argon2's key features.

  • Default: Typically 65536 (64 MiB).

  • Recommendation:

    • Use a value that your system can comfortably handle (e.g., 65536 for 64 MiB).

    • Increase it (e.g., 131072 for 128 MiB) for higher security, but ensure your system has enough memory.


3. parallelism

  • Purpose: Controls the number of threads (or lanes) used during the hashing process.

  • Effect:

    • Increasing parallelism allows the algorithm to use multiple CPU cores, speeding up the hashing process.

    • However, it also increases the risk of side-channel attacks if not configured properly.

  • Default: Typically 4.

  • Recommendation:

    • Set it to the number of available CPU cores on your system.

    • For most systems, 4 is a reasonable default.


4. hash_len

  • Purpose: Controls the length (in bytes) of the output hash.

  • Effect:

    • A longer hash provides more security but increases storage requirements.

    • The hash length must be at least 16 bytes to be secure.

  • Default: Typically 32 (32 bytes, or 256 bits).

  • Recommendation:

    • Use the default value of 32 for most applications.

    • Only increase it if you have specific security requirements.


5. salt_len

  • Purpose: Controls the length (in bytes) of the randomly generated salt.

  • Effect:

    • A longer salt increases the uniqueness of each hash, making it harder for attackers to use precomputed tables (rainbow tables).

    • The salt is automatically generated and included in the hashed output.

  • Default: Typically 16 (16 bytes, or 128 bits).

  • Recommendation:

    • Use the default value of 16 for most applications.

    • Only increase it if you have specific security requirements.


Example Configuration


How to Choose Parameters

  1. Security vs. Performance:

    • Higher values for time_cost, memory_cost, and parallelism increase security but also increase computational and memory requirements.

    • Balance these parameters based on your system's capabilities and your security needs.

  2. Testing:

    • Test the hashing process on your system to ensure it completes within an acceptable time frame (e.g., 0.5–1 second for login operations).

  3. Defaults:

    • If you're unsure, start with the default values and adjust them as needed.


Example Output

When you hash a password with these parameters, the output will look something like this:

This string includes:

  • The algorithm (argon2id).

  • The version (v=19).

  • The parameters (m, t, p).

  • The salt.

  • The hash.


By tuning these parameters, you can optimize Argon2 for your specific use case while maintaining a high level of security.

Last updated